They're all for babies until they're born. Then they don't want to feed them. Red states turned down free federal programs to feed children. They don't care if children are slaughtered in classrooms. In reality they do not like children. And they don't care if a woman is bleeding out on the floor having a miscarriage. I do not understand ANY woman supporting these fascists.
Today, Kyle Cheney Tweeted, “I’m sure a lot of people, like JD Vance, who embraced Trump’s strategy to have Mike Pence decide which electors to count are going to love that Kamala Harris gets to decide whether she should be president on Jan. 6, 2025.” What goes around comes around.
"Delegates" are for the Democratic convention. They choose the Democratic nominee for president. "Electors" are part of the Electoral College. They officially choose who becomes president, based on the electoral votes from each state. They are not the same thing. IOW, it's not "already done."
That occurred to me yesterday. Has a veep who was a presidential candidate ever been in that position when they won the election? I know Nixon and GWHB were losing candidates who had to preside over the final counting.
No, when Reagan finished his 8 years as President January 20. 1989, George H.W. Bush, his Vice President took over as President January 20, 1989. So, he must have presided over the Electoral College ballot count. January 6, 2021 was the only year in the history of the United States, that the Electoral College Count was anything but ceremonial. That ceremony is always during the First week of January. Before 2021 no one paid any attention because it was just ceremonial.
The votes have to be certified in the States on or before December 20.
Not quite, Gore, being a gentleman AND an American presided over the Electoral college ceremony the first week of January 2001 as had countless VP's before him. It must have been a bitter moment for Al, knowing he had won the popular vote by a couple of million votes at least and that defeat had been handed to him by the Supreme Court.
Pence must feel some pride that he of all the former Republican party kept the faith with the Constitution during the first (and I sincerely hope only) Insurrection to overturn an election EVER in the history of United States in all 245 years.
Let's remember: It's only Dem presidential candidates who've won the popular vote and lost the electoral college vote. Gore and Hillary. And did the Dems storm the capital? Nope! Looking back, maybe we should have....NOT, of course. We play fair and gracious; the GOP, not so much. Can you image where this country would be had Gore and his belief in global warming won? Can you image the COVID years with Hillary in charge? Do you think there would have been over a million people in the US dead from the virus? And what would the Supreme Court have looked like had Hillary been President? Elections matter! Taking Plan 2025 into consideration, we need to do what Lyndon Johnson did against Barry Goldwater: Recall the infamous "Daisy Girl" ad anyone? We need to stop being nice and fight like hell to protect our country.
You're right, Bill, I never thought of that. Joe Biden is President until January 20, 2025. As Vice President, Kamala Harris will count the ballots and declare herself as the 47th President of the United States. A number of VP's have done so in the past, I believe the last one was George H.W. Bush. We'd better have both the Virginia, and the Maryland National Guard on full duty at the Capitol January 6, 2025. At least this time we have in place a REAL President who cares more about America, it's citizens, our Constitution than he does about himself.
Correction: If Biden were to resign before his term is over and Harris were to become President, whoever Harris has as VP will preside over that process.
If Kamala were to become President today, she could still serve two full terms. If a VP takes over as President when there is less than a certain amount of time left in the presidential term, they can have two full terms for themselves. I don't recall offhand what that amount of time is, but it Kamala is well within the allotted time. LBJ took over for JFK November 1963, He was President for just a bit less then a year when he was elected in 1964. He was eligible to run again in 1968, but chose not to. I remember the GOP questioning his eligibility, but the law was clear. If Kamala were to take over the presidency today, she would be fill a much smaller amount of the term then LBJ did. (I wonder if Mike Johnson who called for Biden to reign thinks Kamala couldn't have two full terms)
If I get a chance later today, I'll try to find where the cut off is. I think it is if the VP served more than half of the previous president's term, they are not eligible to run for a 2nd term of their own.
The danger, if Biden resigned and Harris became president, is that Mike Johnson, as Speaker of the House, would be next in line of succession if anything happened to her.
Nope, I’m wrong. Pulled out the good ol’ Constitution, and Shirley is correct — at this point, if Kamala became president b/c Joe resigned then she would still be able to run for two terms after the term she stepped into was over. See Amendment 22, Section 1.
I would believe there is only one scenario that he would resign. If on the OFF, OFF, OFF chance the felon wins, I could see him resigning in Jan allowing her to become the first female president.
Even if women only had sex with men with the intent of conceiving children, (hello, incels, is that what you want?) there would *still* need to be abortions.
Ectopic pregnancies and other complications that can be fatal to the mother. (According to Jewish law, as I understand it, in those cases an abortion *must* be performed, because the mother's life is most important.) Incomplete miscarriages. Fatal abnormalities in the fetus. (Unless you want a child delivered who will spend their only two minutes of life fighting to take a breath with lungs that didn't develop, as happened in one case that made the news.)
And there are plenty of sensible, humane policies that would *reduce* the number of elective abortions: Accurate sex education. Free and readily available contraceptives. Raising the minimum wage. Guaranteed housing. Expanded SNAP benefits. Better maternal health care. Paid family leave. More support for families with special-needs children. Better education at all levels.
Republicans, especially the two at the top of the ticket, don't want ANY of those things.
I still don't get the reasoning on banning all abortions... If the mother dies the fetus dies. So if there is a non viable pregnancy why is there a question? Obviously to punish the mother.
Exactly - they are for forced birth - not for children. they are for control of women. they are for the patriarchy -- a word that's much over-used lately - but it's true of the GOP.
We risk entering modern dark ages. Many of us could lose our civil rights. The right to vote. Some of us could face physical; harm. Millions of unregistered folk trend heavily Democratic. FT6 has a database containing 9 million unregistered likely Democrats in swing states. FT6 uses every outreach method there is: email, text, phone, geofencing, direct mail, targeted ads, social media storms, postcards, and live voter drives. Register Democrats -- save the world.
Please understand exactly what a cult it is. There are those who have known me before I was born but will vote for trump because they only vote red/think red is better at supporting the police.
Lauren - If your kin folk are voting for Trump because they adore him then I would agree that they're in a cult. But if, like many millions, they always vote party instead of candidate I'd say they're just lazy or don't really care.
Not family. Family friend. He was a police officer. She a cancer survivor who was told she wouldn't live out the year...20+years later, she's still alive.
That article doesn't reveal a general acceptance of Nazi militarism or xenophobia, except as those attitudes might apply to economic issues. I understood it to say that women's acceptance of national socialism was primarily based on kitchen table issues. Perhaps acquiesce to the "great replacement theory" of the time, which stressed the duty to bear children was xenophobic, and Hitler as religeous icon was certainly in line with today's MAGA movement, but those attitudes were only stated by inference.
Remember that the essays were written in 1934, when Germany was still trying to recover from the devastation of WWI and Hitler's dreams of world domination weren't yet fully formed. For me the more relevant comparison to today's Trumpettes is found in the words of Agnes Molster-Surm: “God-given Führer and savior, Adolf Hitler, for Germany’s honor, Germany’s fortune and Germany’s freedom!”
There should be a law we women could pass that would put an end to men’s ability to have sex if a woman could not have access to an abortion, contraception, or IVF. Maybe then they would realize how it feels to be denied control over our bodies. Am I being ridiculous? If so apologies to all offended.
I definitely agree that we need to keep up the momentum that we're seeing right now to elect Kamala Harris, gain back the House, and improve our numbers in the Senate. The Trump-Vance ticket is the most anti-woman ticket in history. They have seriously underestimated women. I also want to mention that it's now obvious that the fundraising, the calls, endorsements and the delegates were all an organized plan from the White House. It's been truly brilliant. Biden must have made his decision a few days ago and he had all the paperwork filled out to enable Harris to begin massive fundraising. They had the lists of donors ready to go. They must have had all the phone numbers in place and the logistics so they could call all the state delegates. They must have lined up who they'd call for endorsements. Then, Biden made his announcement early on a Sunday afternoon which totally took Trump, his campaign, Republicans and everyone by surprise. This had to have been planned for it all to happen so quickly and to appear so effortless. This will prevent chaos at the DNC Convention and make it go smoothly. Marc Elias, an expert on voting laws, has already stated that Republican threats of lawsuits (a signature Trump move) won't go anywhere since Biden is not the nominee (that happens at the convention). I am so impressed and you have to know that Biden used his and Harris' staff to make it all work like clockwork. And, in typical Biden fashion, he's not out there taking credit; all the spotlights are on Kamala. So much for his being too old to do the job. Bravo!!
Absolutely spot on...admire your cogent analysis, as what else could explain the explosive surge of donations mere microseconds after Joe released his letter?
MSM had it all wrong, portraying VP Harris "stumbling" through a conference call with donors on Friday, when she evidently knew what was soon to break on Sunday.
Well-played by the Biden-Harris team, and it's paying big dividends!
Apaprently President Biden made the decision late Saturday. It wasn't announced until the last minute to prevent anything from being leaked. She and her husband, along with very few staff who work for both were the last to know in person. Most found out via text/watching the news.
She did it. Kamala got all the delegates she needed in under 48hrs. Watch out. She's got her focus on the rapist fraudster. I hope her campaign gouges and fillets.
MSM trying to stir up an "open process" scenario at or before the DNC...won't happen, sorry - not sorry. There's virtually complete buy-in to VP Harris to take the reins and ride it through Election Day...pundits - fuck off, right?
Good to hear. I wish we could have stayed with Biden. But, with him out we need to give Kamala our full support. As VP she was heir apparent, trying to go any other way would tear the party apart.
Yup. She now has about 3 days to find her message and stick with it. One of the main reasons her primary fell apart was that she kept changing her mind about stuff. And her previous history of being not particularly progressive and pro law-enforcement was completely the wrong message for the 2020 primary. This time around she should laser focus on Trump and Abortion and ignore the mosquitos buzzing about fracking and medicare, etc. Time for her to be the prosecutor America needs right now!
p.s. Beyonce's "Freedom" is a great choice for campaign song. Trump/Vance are crushing America's core. We need to be free from their oppression.
p.p.s. Obama and Pelosi encouraged this whole open-process discussion, so it wasn't completely a media thing. But I agree it should be shut down.
p.p.p.s. I love watching the GOP squeal about trying to keep Biden on the ballot. For those of you who doubted who GOP wanted to run against, now you know. And the GOP lost.
Loved Kamala's speech today: she's a prosecutor and she knows men like Trump. She's going to be fine. It's too bad so many are saying that two women on the ticket would be too much, after centuries of two men on the ticket. We still have a long way to go.
It makes me angry the media displays Trump saying such nasty things like “crooked” Biden and Kamala being “nuts”. Trump is such an immature bully. Why do they allow his trash talk?
I think we should all write the media and object. I did today.
It's outrageous that his "Biden crime family" and "crooked" Biden lies should be reported as though these claims have any foundation whatsoever. Or if they are, why not also note that the only president in our history convicted of felonies (and found by another jury to have committed sexual assault) is Donald Trump.
The corporate media is owned by greedy bastards who think a Trump presidency is in their best interest. Plus, the more controversy they stir up, the more money they make. So their reporting is completely one-sided, just like Fox or any other right wing outlet.
A characteristic of MAGAtts is that they find their news from obscure echo chambers on the internet. We should aim higher: listen to opposing viewpoints. Understand the enemy. Have confidence in our positions. But not hunker down and hide from NyTimes, CNN, WaPo, MSNBC, etc. That makes no sense. [Not saying that you have to send them any money, of course!]
Notice how much more peaceful the countries are where women are in charge. See New Zealand under their former Prime Minister who stepped down this year.
They had a real scare in France recently due to a woman and Italy has a woman authoritarian problem presently. And shall I remind you of Thatcher? Tyranny comes in both sexes its just women havent been able to show power enough with all the sexism.
I used to think that too. While I don't think female leaders would be inclined to use nuclear weapons, there are too many recent examples of female leaders being truly awful both here and abroad. Just today the prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina, implemented a bloody crackdown on protesters.
As a thought experiment, suppose there's something in some countries water that makes the people act more humanely, to choose the best candidates, etc, regardless of sex, race, etc. Difficult to argue that such societies wouldn't be more likely to have a woman leader than societies without such water. An alien landing on earth would see countries with women leaders as more likely to be calm and benign. But really it was the water.... The old causation vs correlation argument.
... That said, I would definitely be interested in a list of countries ranked by peacefulness. Must be a link somewhere...
Here are some thoughts about the Comstock Act. It’s time to go after men’s ED medication and devices that are advertised via various means including emails and radio ads. Insist that men have an ultrasound of their prostates plus a physical prostate exam and a waiting period to get ED items, no more simply using telemedicine in the privacy of one’s home or allowing pharmacies to ship these items.
Certainly an erect penis is related to the Comstock Act which appears to be defined as “Act of the Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of Immoral Use.” Would there be the need for abortions without penises and sperm? Time to make what’s bad for the goose bad for the gander.
You remind me that as a senator, Kamala Harris asked Brett Kavanaugh at his Supreme Court confirmation hearing if he could think of any laws that attempt to control what men can do with their bodies. He was not able to think of one. It's curious that nothing related to men's role in pregnancy comes under scrutiny. Even though rape is criminalized, the pregnancy that might result from rape is, in many people's minds, something that the raped woman has to just deal with, despite her lack of consent.
It has puzzled me for years why we've allowed the right-wing's narrative about birth control and taking away abortion rights to completely keep men out of the picture.
I think the draft does several things. It keeps the armed forces staffed. It involves a mix of personality types, you get agressives as well as calmer types which I think would minimize events like Abou Greb (sp?) . And when more of the population is affected by war, wars are shorter. If we had a draft there is NO WAY the American people would have stood for a twenty year war in the Middle East.
Id agree, those were all reasons before the draft was abolished. It also was very unfair, allowing the wealthy to buy their sins out of the obligation, and Vietnam was very unpopular, and it was inky a 15 year war.
In the 21st century, the idea of only drafting men for war is preposterous, in my humble opinion. Both men and women get bone spurs. And bullets shoot through their bodies equally.
This makes my blood boil. I was a victim of date rape, meaning unconscious during the crime, back in 1967 when I was barely 18. But, of course, date rape was not a thing back then. In a small town in Ohio if you became pregnant then you were a slut and it was your fault. There was no option of an abortion and no penalty for the perpetrator. It makes me crazy angry to think there is a possibility that things could be like that again. We have to win this election and I'm more hopeful now that is possible.
When the little twit was nominated there was a great deal of talk about the app he shared with his son that made them accountable to each other every time they loaded porn on their phones.
I'm not a regular coffee drinker, and what I drink is always decaf. But apparently that helped today because I spelled the word I wanted correctly. Fraud works, too. Thank you.
Let us not forget that Trump has talked about wanting to do public executions on television. I guess Fox News would get the exclusive on that. That is a Gaddafi move. Trump has a "hit" list too, which is true of all fascists. Hitler is known to have had the people killed on his list of 400, which included a close ally, while having a tea party at his home for his cabinet members and their families. This is why I don't need to ever watch horror movies, because I am a student of history. There is enough gore in that to fill a lifetime.
I’m also a history buff and a huge part of the problem is the absence of factual history and critical thinking being taught in our schools. I’ve been through seven presidents in my lifetime and I’ve read a lot about American history. If we don’t learn from it, we’re doomed to keep repeating it.
Steel yourselves, this is going to be an ugly six months—both before the election and after, because as we know, plans are being crafted to fight the outcome. We must hold steady, true, resolved. For our daughters and granddaughters—we can’t, and won’t, go back.
Why does he keep saying there will be a “blood bath”? And why is Mike Flynn training a multitude in shooting guns? (Was on a PBS documentary about Flynn)
It's appalling that J.D. Vance "said he would have blocked the certification of the Electoral College vote if it had been up to him on January 6, 2021." He's an Attorney and should know better. Have they stopped teaching Constitutional Law at Yale?
He’s an opportunist. And he’s learned that you don’t have to follow the law to win. He’s running with someone who has broken every law imaginable, and still not in jail.
The number of Trumplicans with advanced degrees, many from elite universities, has made me realize that education is wasted to those with closed minds.
But not a very good or interested attorney. Only practiced a couple years before he hitched his star to that repugnant Thiel and came to San Francisco, of all places!, to make his lucre. Don’t confuse Sycovance with any thing remotely lawful.
Ann, JD Vance’s statement should disqualify him from even BEING a Vice President. As it is a part of our constitution the Vice President certify the (true) electoral votes, isn’t it an assumed “law”?
Framing the issue as a women’s right to choose or right to decide is a much more universal message instead of the right to an abortion. Please take this into account going forward because the implications are far deeper and long term than just whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.
While I agree with you, isn't it also important to de-stigmatize abortion by calling it by its name? The focus on rape and incest are important, but we have to be explicit in defending the core right: of women to control their futures.
And while we're at it, let's call the misogynist anti-abortion laws by their other proper name: forced birth statutes.
Everyone should have free access to birth control more dependable than a condom, and prescribed by an MD. A baby should never be left up to chance and never happen to people who are not grateful for the experience and responsibility.
I quite agree. A woman's right to her own body, even more so that just to choose. I'm 76 now; I just realized that I had gotten the impression from what little sex education I got in my childhood ("Don't touch that!") that my parts "down there" were to be a gift to my husband on our wedding night. Never in those words, exactly, but the combined admonitions from before puberty. This important part of me wasn't really mine. [sigh] How do we unteach that?
I understand what you’re saying. The stigma of the word is real - it’s not a pretty word or image, whether the decision behind it is to save the mothers life, or to spare a fetus a horrendous malformation that will make their life such a challenge it becomes a nightmare, or because of plain fear - of repercussions, of shame, of homelessness, of the inability to care for a child, feed it, clothe it, shelter it. Or a visceral reaction to rape or incest.
And those are only a fraction of the reasons. Not a pretty word, but it’s life in a complicated world that’s often, literally, on fire.
Everyone—everyone—needs to be aware of this Republican Congress’s HR 431– The Personhood at Cenception Act. It has 130 co-sponsors. The only reason it hasn’t come up for a vote is the election. If the Republicans lose the House, it’ll probably be voted on in the lame duck session and go to the Senate—where Joe Manchin’s switch to Independent—means any Democratic defections mean it will pass. Biden won’t sign it, but it’ll come up again.
That’s why the Republicans didn’t fight about changing the Republican platform on abortion—Republicans want this to pass.
The Democrats have to hold one Chamber, or face this
I think Manchin is a non-entity now. As of today, the Kamala campaign amassed $82 million which donations started yesterday. Over 40,000 black women got on Zoom last night and raised $3.1 million for Kamala. Over 30,000 black men also got on Zoom and strategized. The Don is crapping in his Depends and so are the arrogant white nationalists. I left out “Christian” because let’s face it, their incessant rage and hatred has nothing to do with religion.
“This bill declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being at all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual comes into being.”
“Nothing in this bill shall be construed to authorize the prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child.”
As to prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child: ask the woman who received a 20 year sentence for murder for her self-abortion in Indiana. A woman in Tennessee was also convicted of murder for her abortion.
That clause in the bill allows the states to add their own punishment. From the Congressional perspective, it's just "plausible deniability."
Like the states aren't already trying to do that… to prosecute women for miscarriages or abortions, for trying to get to a state where they can get the care they need.
If the Dems lose the Senate, I expect Schumer to eliminate the filibuster immediately. The Republicans in the Senate will do so on January 1st, 2035 anyway
Would LOVE to win the Senate. The path to do that this election cycle is almost impossible given where the number of new seats would need to be won--as well as holding all the current Democratic seats. The current effort is to hold the Republicans to as few seats as possible. The Republicans are expected to eliminate the filibuster within the first month, now that McConnell is out of leadership.
Vance is a bought and paid for disciple of super misogynist Peter Thiel. He also doesn’t believe democracy os complatible with personal freedom. Down with national states, let the oligarchs rule the world.
Thanks as always for providing us with your excellent article. It’s been reported tonight that Kamala Harris has secured enough delegates to be the Democratic Nominee. After her speech today at her Delaware Campaign Office we should all be fired up because as a former prosecutor she really called out Trump for what he is and reminded us that she’s dealt with his kind before and successfully convicted people like Trump who are now serving their time in jail. Trump is going to attack her relentlessly with misogynistic comments and hateful rhetoric and racial and hateful comments about her race and Asian background. She’s the right person to stand toe-to-toe with Trump and calling him out about his awful Presidential Record and all of his lies. As Reverend gAl Sharpton ha3s told that she needs not to prepare herself for not a prizefight but a street fight. I’m looking forward to witnessing the battle and watching her take Trump down.
The pro lifers are the also the pro-gunners. The anti-mifepristone guys are pro-Viagra through the mail, because they aren’t the ones getting pregnant. The ‘shrink the government’ coalition wants to expand every department that serves their agenda. It’s time for MADAM President, and maybe, her Marine pilot, NASA astronaut, current Senator, Arizona hero whose wife, Gabby, had more than a nick to her ear, Mark Kelly as VP to wipe this self-serving, ego-maniacal Republican hypocrisy off the stage of politics.
They're all for babies until they're born. Then they don't want to feed them. Red states turned down free federal programs to feed children. They don't care if children are slaughtered in classrooms. In reality they do not like children. And they don't care if a woman is bleeding out on the floor having a miscarriage. I do not understand ANY woman supporting these fascists.
Today, Kyle Cheney Tweeted, “I’m sure a lot of people, like JD Vance, who embraced Trump’s strategy to have Mike Pence decide which electors to count are going to love that Kamala Harris gets to decide whether she should be president on Jan. 6, 2025.” What goes around comes around.
That's only if we only manage to tie up the electors. We need to be shooting for a landslide so she can just watch and grin.
Already done! Kamala Harris has received 2,538 pledged delegates. 1,976 are needed to become the Democratic nominee.
"Delegates" are for the Democratic convention. They choose the Democratic nominee for president. "Electors" are part of the Electoral College. They officially choose who becomes president, based on the electoral votes from each state. They are not the same thing. IOW, it's not "already done."
Thank you. I learned something new!👍🏽
Yay!!!
That occurred to me yesterday. Has a veep who was a presidential candidate ever been in that position when they won the election? I know Nixon and GWHB were losing candidates who had to preside over the final counting.
No, when Reagan finished his 8 years as President January 20. 1989, George H.W. Bush, his Vice President took over as President January 20, 1989. So, he must have presided over the Electoral College ballot count. January 6, 2021 was the only year in the history of the United States, that the Electoral College Count was anything but ceremonial. That ceremony is always during the First week of January. Before 2021 no one paid any attention because it was just ceremonial.
The votes have to be certified in the States on or before December 20.
Oops, you’re right. I forgot he won in ‘88. Wishful thinking, I guess.
Gore too.
Not quite, Gore, being a gentleman AND an American presided over the Electoral college ceremony the first week of January 2001 as had countless VP's before him. It must have been a bitter moment for Al, knowing he had won the popular vote by a couple of million votes at least and that defeat had been handed to him by the Supreme Court.
Pence must feel some pride that he of all the former Republican party kept the faith with the Constitution during the first (and I sincerely hope only) Insurrection to overturn an election EVER in the history of United States in all 245 years.
Think of how terrifying it was to have people breaking down the doors to lynch him, and that he was whisked to safety by the Secret Service.
Let's remember: It's only Dem presidential candidates who've won the popular vote and lost the electoral college vote. Gore and Hillary. And did the Dems storm the capital? Nope! Looking back, maybe we should have....NOT, of course. We play fair and gracious; the GOP, not so much. Can you image where this country would be had Gore and his belief in global warming won? Can you image the COVID years with Hillary in charge? Do you think there would have been over a million people in the US dead from the virus? And what would the Supreme Court have looked like had Hillary been President? Elections matter! Taking Plan 2025 into consideration, we need to do what Lyndon Johnson did against Barry Goldwater: Recall the infamous "Daisy Girl" ad anyone? We need to stop being nice and fight like hell to protect our country.
Friendly correction: Gore won the popular vote by 543,895, not millions.
INDEED!
You're right, Bill, I never thought of that. Joe Biden is President until January 20, 2025. As Vice President, Kamala Harris will count the ballots and declare herself as the 47th President of the United States. A number of VP's have done so in the past, I believe the last one was George H.W. Bush. We'd better have both the Virginia, and the Maryland National Guard on full duty at the Capitol January 6, 2025. At least this time we have in place a REAL President who cares more about America, it's citizens, our Constitution than he does about himself.
VP Biden certified the results of the 2012 election, for President Obama.
I miss the Obama era, full of class and elegance, and I will of the Biden era with a Dr as FLOTUS.
Interesting! But isn't the counting in Jan. by the VP a ceremonial duty?
Correction: If Biden were to resign before his term is over and Harris were to become President, whoever Harris has as VP will preside over that process.
No it won't.
Biden is the President until 1/20/25 no matter who wins the November election.
In case of another attempt to overthrow the government, the President will still have the ability to declare martial law if need be.
A governor can declare martial law as well as the President.
And who's the governor of DC????
And Kamala Harris will be Vice President until January 20, 2025 at 12 noon, eastern.
As well as president-elect.
Biden needs to stay in office with Kamala as VP if we want her to be able to run for two full terms.
If Kamala were to become President today, she could still serve two full terms. If a VP takes over as President when there is less than a certain amount of time left in the presidential term, they can have two full terms for themselves. I don't recall offhand what that amount of time is, but it Kamala is well within the allotted time. LBJ took over for JFK November 1963, He was President for just a bit less then a year when he was elected in 1964. He was eligible to run again in 1968, but chose not to. I remember the GOP questioning his eligibility, but the law was clear. If Kamala were to take over the presidency today, she would be fill a much smaller amount of the term then LBJ did. (I wonder if Mike Johnson who called for Biden to reign thinks Kamala couldn't have two full terms)
If I get a chance later today, I'll try to find where the cut off is. I think it is if the VP served more than half of the previous president's term, they are not eligible to run for a 2nd term of their own.
The danger, if Biden resigned and Harris became president, is that Mike Johnson, as Speaker of the House, would be next in line of succession if anything happened to her.
Harris would appoint the VP, and that would be a moot point.
MAGA MIKE isn't smart enough to know, he's too stupid to know the Capital was closed to the public on Jan 6th, due to covid.
" (I wonder if Mike Johnson who called for Biden to reign thinks Kamala couldn't have two full terms)"
The GOP only questions things that effect their power.
Nope, I’m wrong. Pulled out the good ol’ Constitution, and Shirley is correct — at this point, if Kamala became president b/c Joe resigned then she would still be able to run for two terms after the term she stepped into was over. See Amendment 22, Section 1.
No reason for Biden to resign. If he should pass or be incapacitated, she'd be President and that scenario would then play out.
Biden will NOT resign before the end of his term. I am sure of that!
I would believe there is only one scenario that he would resign. If on the OFF, OFF, OFF chance the felon wins, I could see him resigning in Jan allowing her to become the first female president.
That would be kind of cool.
All true! Thank you for articulating the hypocrisy of the Republican party when it comes to "saving" children!
Exactly. Republicans care as much about children as they do about law and order.
And the Constitution, apparently.
You can add the Sermon of the Mount to that list too.
They’re all for the potential profit they can make as they turn back child labor laws.
This is absolutely a part of Project 2025. So many Trump supporters don’t understand that the Heritage society intends to make them serfs.
Well, maybe someone (us) should tell them.
Even if women only had sex with men with the intent of conceiving children, (hello, incels, is that what you want?) there would *still* need to be abortions.
Ectopic pregnancies and other complications that can be fatal to the mother. (According to Jewish law, as I understand it, in those cases an abortion *must* be performed, because the mother's life is most important.) Incomplete miscarriages. Fatal abnormalities in the fetus. (Unless you want a child delivered who will spend their only two minutes of life fighting to take a breath with lungs that didn't develop, as happened in one case that made the news.)
And there are plenty of sensible, humane policies that would *reduce* the number of elective abortions: Accurate sex education. Free and readily available contraceptives. Raising the minimum wage. Guaranteed housing. Expanded SNAP benefits. Better maternal health care. Paid family leave. More support for families with special-needs children. Better education at all levels.
Republicans, especially the two at the top of the ticket, don't want ANY of those things.
I still don't get the reasoning on banning all abortions... If the mother dies the fetus dies. So if there is a non viable pregnancy why is there a question? Obviously to punish the mother.
So many men do not accept all of the dangers and complications that go along with pregnancy and delivery. It is nine months of anxiety.
And they certainly don't, and aren't made to, take responsibility for their sperm.
Exactly - they are for forced birth - not for children. they are for control of women. they are for the patriarchy -- a word that's much over-used lately - but it's true of the GOP.
The are NOT BABIES. They are fetuses, at varying stages of viability,
Stop it.
Its amazing that so many antiabortionists just ignore these facts! They're inhumane and worse but I'll stop now!
I too didn't understand why women support these fascists. This article helped me understand a little. https://theconversation.com/why-did-women-vote-for-hitler-long-forgotten-essays-hold-some-answers-134481
We risk entering modern dark ages. Many of us could lose our civil rights. The right to vote. Some of us could face physical; harm. Millions of unregistered folk trend heavily Democratic. FT6 has a database containing 9 million unregistered likely Democrats in swing states. FT6 uses every outreach method there is: email, text, phone, geofencing, direct mail, targeted ads, social media storms, postcards, and live voter drives. Register Democrats -- save the world.
https://www.mobilize.us/ft6/event/643086/
https://www.fieldteam6.org/
The Hitler article made reference to "the weaker sex."
I guess we'll see how THAT expression has aged!
Seb Gorka got there with his she's a colored woman remark.
Perhaps you missed the part where she said, "the so-called ‘weaker sex’"
Please understand exactly what a cult it is. There are those who have known me before I was born but will vote for trump because they only vote red/think red is better at supporting the police.
Lauren - If your kin folk are voting for Trump because they adore him then I would agree that they're in a cult. But if, like many millions, they always vote party instead of candidate I'd say they're just lazy or don't really care.
Not family. Family friend. He was a police officer. She a cancer survivor who was told she wouldn't live out the year...20+years later, she's still alive.
That article doesn't reveal a general acceptance of Nazi militarism or xenophobia, except as those attitudes might apply to economic issues. I understood it to say that women's acceptance of national socialism was primarily based on kitchen table issues. Perhaps acquiesce to the "great replacement theory" of the time, which stressed the duty to bear children was xenophobic, and Hitler as religeous icon was certainly in line with today's MAGA movement, but those attitudes were only stated by inference.
Remember that the essays were written in 1934, when Germany was still trying to recover from the devastation of WWI and Hitler's dreams of world domination weren't yet fully formed. For me the more relevant comparison to today's Trumpettes is found in the words of Agnes Molster-Surm: “God-given Führer and savior, Adolf Hitler, for Germany’s honor, Germany’s fortune and Germany’s freedom!”
Yes. Good point.
Texas has the highest infant and maternal mortality rates, and California has the lowest.
TX taxes are actually higher than CA's, contrary to "popular" belief.
Why anyone from CA would move to that dreadful state is beyond me.
GET IN LINE!
Lead the way!!
Exactly!
There should be a law we women could pass that would put an end to men’s ability to have sex if a woman could not have access to an abortion, contraception, or IVF. Maybe then they would realize how it feels to be denied control over our bodies. Am I being ridiculous? If so apologies to all offended.
Obviously very many women are very stupid!
I definitely agree that we need to keep up the momentum that we're seeing right now to elect Kamala Harris, gain back the House, and improve our numbers in the Senate. The Trump-Vance ticket is the most anti-woman ticket in history. They have seriously underestimated women. I also want to mention that it's now obvious that the fundraising, the calls, endorsements and the delegates were all an organized plan from the White House. It's been truly brilliant. Biden must have made his decision a few days ago and he had all the paperwork filled out to enable Harris to begin massive fundraising. They had the lists of donors ready to go. They must have had all the phone numbers in place and the logistics so they could call all the state delegates. They must have lined up who they'd call for endorsements. Then, Biden made his announcement early on a Sunday afternoon which totally took Trump, his campaign, Republicans and everyone by surprise. This had to have been planned for it all to happen so quickly and to appear so effortless. This will prevent chaos at the DNC Convention and make it go smoothly. Marc Elias, an expert on voting laws, has already stated that Republican threats of lawsuits (a signature Trump move) won't go anywhere since Biden is not the nominee (that happens at the convention). I am so impressed and you have to know that Biden used his and Harris' staff to make it all work like clockwork. And, in typical Biden fashion, he's not out there taking credit; all the spotlights are on Kamala. So much for his being too old to do the job. Bravo!!
Very well said, Patricia.
Absolutely spot on...admire your cogent analysis, as what else could explain the explosive surge of donations mere microseconds after Joe released his letter?
MSM had it all wrong, portraying VP Harris "stumbling" through a conference call with donors on Friday, when she evidently knew what was soon to break on Sunday.
Well-played by the Biden-Harris team, and it's paying big dividends!
Oh, and fuck the media pundits.
Yes, indeed.
Amazing !!! Bravo to both of them !! I’m so impressed with all their loving and caring actions !!
Apaprently President Biden made the decision late Saturday. It wasn't announced until the last minute to prevent anything from being leaked. She and her husband, along with very few staff who work for both were the last to know in person. Most found out via text/watching the news.
I first found out by The Dworkin Report right here on Substack.
I immediately googled Biden Drops Out and it was all the rage.
INDEED!!
She did it. Kamala got all the delegates she needed in under 48hrs. Watch out. She's got her focus on the rapist fraudster. I hope her campaign gouges and fillets.
MSM trying to stir up an "open process" scenario at or before the DNC...won't happen, sorry - not sorry. There's virtually complete buy-in to VP Harris to take the reins and ride it through Election Day...pundits - fuck off, right?
YES!
Good to hear. I wish we could have stayed with Biden. But, with him out we need to give Kamala our full support. As VP she was heir apparent, trying to go any other way would tear the party apart.
...and slices and dices.
Me too!!
Yup. She now has about 3 days to find her message and stick with it. One of the main reasons her primary fell apart was that she kept changing her mind about stuff. And her previous history of being not particularly progressive and pro law-enforcement was completely the wrong message for the 2020 primary. This time around she should laser focus on Trump and Abortion and ignore the mosquitos buzzing about fracking and medicare, etc. Time for her to be the prosecutor America needs right now!
p.s. Beyonce's "Freedom" is a great choice for campaign song. Trump/Vance are crushing America's core. We need to be free from their oppression.
p.p.s. Obama and Pelosi encouraged this whole open-process discussion, so it wasn't completely a media thing. But I agree it should be shut down.
p.p.p.s. I love watching the GOP squeal about trying to keep Biden on the ballot. For those of you who doubted who GOP wanted to run against, now you know. And the GOP lost.
Loved Kamala's speech today: she's a prosecutor and she knows men like Trump. She's going to be fine. It's too bad so many are saying that two women on the ticket would be too much, after centuries of two men on the ticket. We still have a long way to go.
It makes me angry the media displays Trump saying such nasty things like “crooked” Biden and Kamala being “nuts”. Trump is such an immature bully. Why do they allow his trash talk?
I think we should all write the media and object. I did today.
It's outrageous that his "Biden crime family" and "crooked" Biden lies should be reported as though these claims have any foundation whatsoever. Or if they are, why not also note that the only president in our history convicted of felonies (and found by another jury to have committed sexual assault) is Donald Trump.
We'll have to keep reminding everyone of these facts!!
The corporate media is owned by greedy bastards who think a Trump presidency is in their best interest. Plus, the more controversy they stir up, the more money they make. So their reporting is completely one-sided, just like Fox or any other right wing outlet.
CNN seems a little trumpy to me lately.
A little?!?
They've always been trumpy - they gave him so much free airtime in 2016 they were making bank off of him.
“Inciting violence” is not a good theme for a presidential candidate.
Makes no sense at all!!
A characteristic of MAGAtts is that they find their news from obscure echo chambers on the internet. We should aim higher: listen to opposing viewpoints. Understand the enemy. Have confidence in our positions. But not hunker down and hide from NyTimes, CNN, WaPo, MSNBC, etc. That makes no sense. [Not saying that you have to send them any money, of course!]
Keep the faith. As we’ve seen things can change almost overnight. Keep the talk positive.
Women should rule planet Earth
Notice how much more peaceful the countries are where women are in charge. See New Zealand under their former Prime Minister who stepped down this year.
They had a real scare in France recently due to a woman and Italy has a woman authoritarian problem presently. And shall I remind you of Thatcher? Tyranny comes in both sexes its just women havent been able to show power enough with all the sexism.
And few women got through the ‘male smoke screen’ unless they supported the patriarchy.
I used to think that too. While I don't think female leaders would be inclined to use nuclear weapons, there are too many recent examples of female leaders being truly awful both here and abroad. Just today the prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina, implemented a bloody crackdown on protesters.
Brava/Bravo
Time for a REAL change. Men (?) have screwed up almost everything in America!
Harry, it's not just the US. It's all over the world. Compare and contrast the countries with women in charge. See what countries are more peaceful.
As a thought experiment, suppose there's something in some countries water that makes the people act more humanely, to choose the best candidates, etc, regardless of sex, race, etc. Difficult to argue that such societies wouldn't be more likely to have a woman leader than societies without such water. An alien landing on earth would see countries with women leaders as more likely to be calm and benign. But really it was the water.... The old causation vs correlation argument.
... That said, I would definitely be interested in a list of countries ranked by peacefulness. Must be a link somewhere...
Here are some thoughts about the Comstock Act. It’s time to go after men’s ED medication and devices that are advertised via various means including emails and radio ads. Insist that men have an ultrasound of their prostates plus a physical prostate exam and a waiting period to get ED items, no more simply using telemedicine in the privacy of one’s home or allowing pharmacies to ship these items.
Certainly an erect penis is related to the Comstock Act which appears to be defined as “Act of the Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of Immoral Use.” Would there be the need for abortions without penises and sperm? Time to make what’s bad for the goose bad for the gander.
You remind me that as a senator, Kamala Harris asked Brett Kavanaugh at his Supreme Court confirmation hearing if he could think of any laws that attempt to control what men can do with their bodies. He was not able to think of one. It's curious that nothing related to men's role in pregnancy comes under scrutiny. Even though rape is criminalized, the pregnancy that might result from rape is, in many people's minds, something that the raped woman has to just deal with, despite her lack of consent.
It has puzzled me for years why we've allowed the right-wing's narrative about birth control and taking away abortion rights to completely keep men out of the picture.
Rapists are slapped on the hand.
Rape victims seeking healthcare are incarcerated.
Please make it make sense.
There was one law that was only enforced on men, for a long time.
It's called the Draft. Only men had to register
Time to bring it back, no exceptions for bone spurs.
I think the draft does several things. It keeps the armed forces staffed. It involves a mix of personality types, you get agressives as well as calmer types which I think would minimize events like Abou Greb (sp?) . And when more of the population is affected by war, wars are shorter. If we had a draft there is NO WAY the American people would have stood for a twenty year war in the Middle East.
Id agree, those were all reasons before the draft was abolished. It also was very unfair, allowing the wealthy to buy their sins out of the obligation, and Vietnam was very unpopular, and it was inky a 15 year war.
Where have all the flowers gone?
That last line made me cry
In the 21st century, the idea of only drafting men for war is preposterous, in my humble opinion. Both men and women get bone spurs. And bullets shoot through their bodies equally.
This makes my blood boil. I was a victim of date rape, meaning unconscious during the crime, back in 1967 when I was barely 18. But, of course, date rape was not a thing back then. In a small town in Ohio if you became pregnant then you were a slut and it was your fault. There was no option of an abortion and no penalty for the perpetrator. It makes me crazy angry to think there is a possibility that things could be like that again. We have to win this election and I'm more hopeful now that is possible.
You are my hero for saying this out loud, Marjorie!
Hear! Hear! "...an ultrasound of their prostates plus a physical prostate exam..." before each encounter 😈
Agreed.
Maybe applying the Comstock act would get porn eradicated....Mike Johnson would never stand for that.
Wow! What do you know that I haven't heard about?
When the little twit was nominated there was a great deal of talk about the app he shared with his son that made them accountable to each other every time they loaded porn on their phones.
Ugh
Thank you, Jen. I had no idea. I need to learn to spell hypocrite… It seems there is truly no bottom anywhere in the republican party.
Bottom of hell...
It sure seems like where they all want to go, especially the "christians" among them.
You can use fraud if you haven't had enough coffee yet
I'm not a regular coffee drinker, and what I drink is always decaf. But apparently that helped today because I spelled the word I wanted correctly. Fraud works, too. Thank you.
Vance is worse than a lying nitwit. Because he’s a calculating ambitious one.
And one more strange Yale lawyer.......
Education should uplift - - but sometimes even it can’t penetrate some souls.
Let us not forget that Trump has talked about wanting to do public executions on television. I guess Fox News would get the exclusive on that. That is a Gaddafi move. Trump has a "hit" list too, which is true of all fascists. Hitler is known to have had the people killed on his list of 400, which included a close ally, while having a tea party at his home for his cabinet members and their families. This is why I don't need to ever watch horror movies, because I am a student of history. There is enough gore in that to fill a lifetime.
I’m also a history buff and a huge part of the problem is the absence of factual history and critical thinking being taught in our schools. I’ve been through seven presidents in my lifetime and I’ve read a lot about American history. If we don’t learn from it, we’re doomed to keep repeating it.
Steel yourselves, this is going to be an ugly six months—both before the election and after, because as we know, plans are being crafted to fight the outcome. We must hold steady, true, resolved. For our daughters and granddaughters—we can’t, and won’t, go back.
I hope this time the Capitol is secured with sufficient guards.
The Capitol will be fine Jan 6. I'm more worried about this Trump-strengthened SCOTUS handing him a victory over some technicality.
Who's gonna hold Chief Justice Roberts (who presides over presidential inauguration,) accountable?
Why does he keep saying there will be a “blood bath”? And why is Mike Flynn training a multitude in shooting guns? (Was on a PBS documentary about Flynn)
flynn, a general in search of an army.
David, Well then I guess we will be the ones rioting.
? “We”? Are you a MAGAT?
No no...... was tongue in cheek, sorry !
Marlo, I think it will be...and we have the actual army on our side if needed.
The proud boy ilks are just dying to use their gun toys.
I was thinking the same thing, “gird your loins!”
It's appalling that J.D. Vance "said he would have blocked the certification of the Electoral College vote if it had been up to him on January 6, 2021." He's an Attorney and should know better. Have they stopped teaching Constitutional Law at Yale?
He’s an opportunist. And he’s learned that you don’t have to follow the law to win. He’s running with someone who has broken every law imaginable, and still not in jail.
I think he's learned that the best way to win is to not follow the law, if you are unpopular, and have unpopular views and plans…
The number of Trumplicans with advanced degrees, many from elite universities, has made me realize that education is wasted to those with closed minds.
But not a very good or interested attorney. Only practiced a couple years before he hitched his star to that repugnant Thiel and came to San Francisco, of all places!, to make his lucre. Don’t confuse Sycovance with any thing remotely lawful.
Sycovance is a gem. Also, if you look at his finance career either he wasn't very good at it or he was a bad boss and got pushed out, repeatedly.
Ann, JD Vance’s statement should disqualify him from even BEING a Vice President. As it is a part of our constitution the Vice President certify the (true) electoral votes, isn’t it an assumed “law”?
Agree wholeheartedly. Does the oath to uphold the Constitution mean nothing? Nevermind. I know the answer….
Apparently, Ann.
Has Yale been invaded by anarchists ?
Framing the issue as a women’s right to choose or right to decide is a much more universal message instead of the right to an abortion. Please take this into account going forward because the implications are far deeper and long term than just whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.
While I agree with you, isn't it also important to de-stigmatize abortion by calling it by its name? The focus on rape and incest are important, but we have to be explicit in defending the core right: of women to control their futures.
And while we're at it, let's call the misogynist anti-abortion laws by their other proper name: forced birth statutes.
Everyone should have free access to birth control more dependable than a condom, and prescribed by an MD. A baby should never be left up to chance and never happen to people who are not grateful for the experience and responsibility.
Hence, enslavement. See Amendment 13
BOOM! Well said, Mitchell!
I agree, Mitchell. Language matters.
I quite agree. A woman's right to her own body, even more so that just to choose. I'm 76 now; I just realized that I had gotten the impression from what little sex education I got in my childhood ("Don't touch that!") that my parts "down there" were to be a gift to my husband on our wedding night. Never in those words, exactly, but the combined admonitions from before puberty. This important part of me wasn't really mine. [sigh] How do we unteach that?
I understand what you’re saying. The stigma of the word is real - it’s not a pretty word or image, whether the decision behind it is to save the mothers life, or to spare a fetus a horrendous malformation that will make their life such a challenge it becomes a nightmare, or because of plain fear - of repercussions, of shame, of homelessness, of the inability to care for a child, feed it, clothe it, shelter it. Or a visceral reaction to rape or incest.
And those are only a fraction of the reasons. Not a pretty word, but it’s life in a complicated world that’s often, literally, on fire.
I couldn’t agree more. Thanks for bringing that up!
Everyone—everyone—needs to be aware of this Republican Congress’s HR 431– The Personhood at Cenception Act. It has 130 co-sponsors. The only reason it hasn’t come up for a vote is the election. If the Republicans lose the House, it’ll probably be voted on in the lame duck session and go to the Senate—where Joe Manchin’s switch to Independent—means any Democratic defections mean it will pass. Biden won’t sign it, but it’ll come up again.
That’s why the Republicans didn’t fight about changing the Republican platform on abortion—Republicans want this to pass.
The Democrats have to hold one Chamber, or face this
I think Manchin is a non-entity now. As of today, the Kamala campaign amassed $82 million which donations started yesterday. Over 40,000 black women got on Zoom last night and raised $3.1 million for Kamala. Over 30,000 black men also got on Zoom and strategized. The Don is crapping in his Depends and so are the arrogant white nationalists. I left out “Christian” because let’s face it, their incessant rage and hatred has nothing to do with religion.
Joe Manchin is no longer a Democrat officially. That changes the # of Democrats. Right now, Joe caucuses with the Dems, but he’s not a sure vote
HR-431:
“This bill declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being at all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual comes into being.”
“Nothing in this bill shall be construed to authorize the prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child.”
thank you for posting the text of the bill.
As to prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child: ask the woman who received a 20 year sentence for murder for her self-abortion in Indiana. A woman in Tennessee was also convicted of murder for her abortion.
That clause in the bill allows the states to add their own punishment. From the Congressional perspective, it's just "plausible deniability."
Like the states aren't already trying to do that… to prosecute women for miscarriages or abortions, for trying to get to a state where they can get the care they need.
Don't forget the filibuster. They would need 60 votes in the Senate during the lame duck period to pass it. They won't get to 60.
If the Dems lose the Senate, I expect Schumer to eliminate the filibuster immediately. The Republicans in the Senate will do so on January 1st, 2035 anyway
Don’t you mean WIN the Senate? (We also need to FLIP the House)
Would LOVE to win the Senate. The path to do that this election cycle is almost impossible given where the number of new seats would need to be won--as well as holding all the current Democratic seats. The current effort is to hold the Republicans to as few seats as possible. The Republicans are expected to eliminate the filibuster within the first month, now that McConnell is out of leadership.
Absolutely agree with you Joyce, get ready to vote! We are in this fight together!
Vance is a bought and paid for disciple of super misogynist Peter Thiel. He also doesn’t believe democracy os complatible with personal freedom. Down with national states, let the oligarchs rule the world.
The two of them also do not believe women should have the right to vote.
Isn’t part of the oath of office to DEFEND and SUPPORT the constitution? To me, this disqualifies Trump and Vance AND the MAGATs in Congress.
Thanks as always for providing us with your excellent article. It’s been reported tonight that Kamala Harris has secured enough delegates to be the Democratic Nominee. After her speech today at her Delaware Campaign Office we should all be fired up because as a former prosecutor she really called out Trump for what he is and reminded us that she’s dealt with his kind before and successfully convicted people like Trump who are now serving their time in jail. Trump is going to attack her relentlessly with misogynistic comments and hateful rhetoric and racial and hateful comments about her race and Asian background. She’s the right person to stand toe-to-toe with Trump and calling him out about his awful Presidential Record and all of his lies. As Reverend gAl Sharpton ha3s told that she needs not to prepare herself for not a prizefight but a street fight. I’m looking forward to witnessing the battle and watching her take Trump down.
Dang, Joyce. I spit up in the back of my throat. Trump is such a danger. I hope enough of us can vote him out.
The pro lifers are the also the pro-gunners. The anti-mifepristone guys are pro-Viagra through the mail, because they aren’t the ones getting pregnant. The ‘shrink the government’ coalition wants to expand every department that serves their agenda. It’s time for MADAM President, and maybe, her Marine pilot, NASA astronaut, current Senator, Arizona hero whose wife, Gabby, had more than a nick to her ear, Mark Kelly as VP to wipe this self-serving, ego-maniacal Republican hypocrisy off the stage of politics.