3 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Hi L.D., Clarence Thomas is morally weak. Ginny is conniving - and I believe she offered her husband's influence to Mark Meadows and Donald Trump on January 6. She was so anxious to reach them, telling them over and over to 'press on' and 'don't give up.' She went to the January 6th committee (voluntarily after receiving their letter); and had no trouble claiming mea culpa and "I wish I had never sent the text messages." Of course.

Those messages are and were incriminating enough that Jack Smith can call for a Grand Jury investigation and let the Grand Jury decide if she warrants an indictment. Until then, Ginny and Clarence will continue to thumb their noses at us. And drive the motor home to Costco and home.

V

Expand full comment

Your points are well taken, but I think I’d go further on Clarence and call him totally morally bankrupt. What’s worse, he’s arrogant and believes he’s untouchable in his lofty position. He knows that while he could be impeached, like Trump, the Republicans need him right where he is and the Senate would never come up with a two-thirds vote to convict.

I must say that I think it would be a stretch to successfully prosecute her. Also, Smith has a lot bigger fish to fry. I think he’s brilliant. It’s just a shame that Garland waited so long to appoint a Special Prosecutor. I think that he’ll be the one going down in the history books as the guy who dropped the ball. LDM

Expand full comment

I ageee about Clarence Thomas. He was never qualified as a Supreme Court justice. The fact that he was inserted as a replacement for Thurgood Marshall is an insult to anyone who has ever worked to further social justice. it was a terrible decision then and it’s been horrific for the United States. Indeed, he is horrid and has harmed so many citizens with his pretend conservative votes. He’s a recipient of affirmative action and has taken that away. He is a minority yet he has come right out and said that he will vote to remove same-sex marriage rights (there is a bill in Hawaii now requesting a change to the constitution to offer protection for their same-sex marriage law simply because Clarence Thomas has been vocal about reversing same-sex marriage at this Supreme Court level. There is nothing concrete on which I can make this kind of suggestion or suspect his motives, but I wonder if he’s working on getting another motorhome with these votes and promises to vote as the conservative puppet masters prefer.Or he may even be angling to get his own island, like Mike Johnson gained after he became speaker with only $30,000 in his bank account. Who could have guessed the value of a ‘pay for play ‘ vote.

Expand full comment