It is extremely hard to claim inadequate legal representation once the client agrees to let someone else choose and pay for their attorney. Why this young woman, who practices law in family court, was deemed suitable representation for Nauta tells me there's someone else behind her who is going to use her as a puppet of sorts. She's goin…
It is extremely hard to claim inadequate legal representation once the client agrees to let someone else choose and pay for their attorney. Why this young woman, who practices law in family court, was deemed suitable representation for Nauta tells me there's someone else behind her who is going to use her as a puppet of sorts. She's going to be way over her head, it will disrupt proceedings and Nauta will ask the court to dismiss her (it's not easy to fire your lawyer, often you have to explain to the court and get their approval). There might be a request made by the other attorneys for severance, meaning that they'll ask the court to try both defendants separately.
Got it Matycat but, I am working out the many factors of Mimi's thought, a Motion for Severance by Nauta's counsel who must discharge her fiduciary duties of competence &`loyalty to her client while facing the most capable & tough Jack Smith & Team. I have exactly one contact in Florida to consult.
Monday 7/10/23 Up Motion for Severance through Mimi, thank you.
MONDAY UPDATE 7 PM Pacific:
Mimi:
You sre correct; Judges/Cannon-Reinhardt did GRANT a motion to SEVER yesterday to 2 of 5 Defendants in the US vs. Carver et al case. The 2 severed Defendants TRIAL was re-set in 6 1/2 Weeks on 9/25/23. So severance can be obtained but, note the Prosecutor did NOT object.
Background:
I took Professor Vance's advice & was able to access U.S. vs. Carver, 9:22-cr-80022 on Court Listener. Note, a Motion to Withdraw (very difficult) was also posted on PACER on 7/9/23 in the Carver case.. I do not have the details
We still need a reality check on what is or is not possible in this Florida District Court system & how much purposeful delay will be tolerated by the Court.
It is extremely hard to claim inadequate legal representation once the client agrees to let someone else choose and pay for their attorney. Why this young woman, who practices law in family court, was deemed suitable representation for Nauta tells me there's someone else behind her who is going to use her as a puppet of sorts. She's going to be way over her head, it will disrupt proceedings and Nauta will ask the court to dismiss her (it's not easy to fire your lawyer, often you have to explain to the court and get their approval). There might be a request made by the other attorneys for severance, meaning that they'll ask the court to try both defendants separately.
Got it Matycat but, I am working out the many factors of Mimi's thought, a Motion for Severance by Nauta's counsel who must discharge her fiduciary duties of competence &`loyalty to her client while facing the most capable & tough Jack Smith & Team. I have exactly one contact in Florida to consult.
I feel that severance is the path to more fair outcomes for both.....meaning, accurately sentenced.
Monday 7/10/23 Up Motion for Severance through Mimi, thank you.
MONDAY UPDATE 7 PM Pacific:
Mimi:
You sre correct; Judges/Cannon-Reinhardt did GRANT a motion to SEVER yesterday to 2 of 5 Defendants in the US vs. Carver et al case. The 2 severed Defendants TRIAL was re-set in 6 1/2 Weeks on 9/25/23. So severance can be obtained but, note the Prosecutor did NOT object.
Background:
I took Professor Vance's advice & was able to access U.S. vs. Carver, 9:22-cr-80022 on Court Listener. Note, a Motion to Withdraw (very difficult) was also posted on PACER on 7/9/23 in the Carver case.. I do not have the details
We still need a reality check on what is or is not possible in this Florida District Court system & how much purposeful delay will be tolerated by the Court.
Respectfully,
bsm