Steve, yes, stories are powerful, particularly if you have one that relates directly to the people you are talking with. I would like to hear someone interviewed who helped develop the plan and maybe reps from some of those 100 organizations that endorse it to see what they were thinking, who put them up to it, how much they were paid to…
Steve, yes, stories are powerful, particularly if you have one that relates directly to the people you are talking with. I would like to hear someone interviewed who helped develop the plan and maybe reps from some of those 100 organizations that endorse it to see what they were thinking, who put them up to it, how much they were paid to essentially betray their country, you know, the usual stuff one would ask a saboteur of democracy. I know their answer would be bull**it, but it would be interesting to hear their cookie-cutter answers which will make no sense to any thinking person, but will sound just great to them, guys who are so addicted to power and money they can hardly function without hurting someone.
OMG, yes! Has anything like this been done? If not, why not? A top question would have to be "How do you reconcile Project 2025 with the U.S. Constitution?"
Barb McQuaid does a great job in her book "Attack from Within" describing mis-, dis-, and mal-information (MSM), and how it operates. If you ask the question proposed, they would try to dismiss your question and denigrate the source.of the query.
Its a deplorable debate tactic, but anyone involved with the plan will provide a sales pitch not a substantive answer.
I was just looking on Amazon and there are many books and even t-shirts presenting a pro-Project 2025 point of view, if you can believe that. I was horrified.
At this point, after reading P2025, the depth of depravity to which people will descend is appalling. Whether in support of the lies in the manifesto, or in efforts capitalize on it.
Steve, yes, stories are powerful, particularly if you have one that relates directly to the people you are talking with. I would like to hear someone interviewed who helped develop the plan and maybe reps from some of those 100 organizations that endorse it to see what they were thinking, who put them up to it, how much they were paid to essentially betray their country, you know, the usual stuff one would ask a saboteur of democracy. I know their answer would be bull**it, but it would be interesting to hear their cookie-cutter answers which will make no sense to any thinking person, but will sound just great to them, guys who are so addicted to power and money they can hardly function without hurting someone.
OMG, yes! Has anything like this been done? If not, why not? A top question would have to be "How do you reconcile Project 2025 with the U.S. Constitution?"
By lying about its content.
Barb McQuaid does a great job in her book "Attack from Within" describing mis-, dis-, and mal-information (MSM), and how it operates. If you ask the question proposed, they would try to dismiss your question and denigrate the source.of the query.
Its a deplorable debate tactic, but anyone involved with the plan will provide a sales pitch not a substantive answer.
They are hardened in wickedness.
I was just looking on Amazon and there are many books and even t-shirts presenting a pro-Project 2025 point of view, if you can believe that. I was horrified.
At this point, after reading P2025, the depth of depravity to which people will descend is appalling. Whether in support of the lies in the manifesto, or in efforts capitalize on it.
Absolutely agree.
Candor shouldn't be expected of anyone involved in the development of the plan, beyond admitting they authored parts of it.