510 Comments

ANYTHING you say, I want to hear! Even if it’s hard for a non-lawyer to understand. This is an extraordinarily complex case, and we “civilians” cannot be lulled into complacency. Keep on schooling us!

Expand full comment

Definitely want more. When I started reading I knew my first question would be How can this judge screw this up?

By the time I finished reading I had stopped hyperventilating.

Thanks.

Expand full comment

Very interested in “a little law school together “.

Expand full comment

Joyce, as you continue to address this aspect of the case, you might want to take a look at the article I published in the Verdict in November, United States v. Donald J. Trump, the Trial of a National Security Case: https://verdict.justia.com/2022/11/15/the-united-states-v-donald-j-trump. In this article I discuss CIPA procedures and the problems prosecutors are likely to face trying to use it to prevent Trump from disclosing classified information that may genuinely be relevant to his defense. I was in charge of the classified information portion of the defense in Noriega, so I have some experience dealing with the nuances of the statute.

As always, love your articles.

Jon May

Expand full comment

Please keep this kind of information coming. I don’t mind some law school at all! It’s very helpful!

Expand full comment

Educating us on the law is necessary to fully understand the consequences of Trump's actions.

Expand full comment

This is admittedly above my head but I agree you are making it easier to understand. Thank you Joyce. This will be one for the history books indeed! Prayers for all....

Expand full comment

Yes, I would. I depend utterly on a close read of your texts, file them away for reference, my very own personal Civil Discourse law book. It seems the LAW is our last, best hope to save democracy. I’m hanging on to every word. What a treasure. And what an experience. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Yes more detail the better. We need context. As to recusal, in my experience as a lawyer and retired fed bankruptcy judge, i found that judges are reluctant to recuse where the basis is bias or the appearance of bias because it goes against their belief that they can be fair. It is also unusual for a fairly new judge to recuse. This is a big deal case and judges, like lawyers, want to be involved in big cases. Luckily the prosecutor is experienced.

Expand full comment

I appreciate your respect and generosity for a wide audience of varying education levels and general understanding. You honour us by allowing us into your law class and giving us the opportunity to learn from you. Keep it coming. We are in this together and we need and appreciate you.

Expand full comment

Incredible clear description of an entirely complex subject. I suppose that both sides have figured out their chess strategy here. Thanks Joyce!!!!

Expand full comment

More, please! The complexities of this trial, the legal twists and turns that inevitably will imerge as the trial progresses are well beyond this poor citizen's ability to understand. I need you!

Expand full comment

I like the detail! It is important to know this information so that we can explain it to friends and family with authority. Thank you for your lucid explanations of hard topics!

Expand full comment

I understand the difficulty of showing top secret documents to jurors. Is there some reason why the documents in question can’t be summarized in general terms by some one authorized to see them? Such as ‘ this document reveals the location of CIA safe houses in country X.’

Expand full comment

Joyce, informative and quite helpful! It will help when hear/read about the upcoming court procedures. I wish federal court procedures were televised!

Expand full comment
Jun 13, 2023·edited Jun 13, 2023

Thank you for providing us with crucial information about how Judge Cannon may be dealt with if she denies prosecutors proper use of the Classified Information Production Act protections (CIPA) . She could have gotten out of the high beams, which will be on her, if she had recused herself. Judge Cannon is now Mystery #1 in this case.

'Judge Cannon was cavalier in her treatment of classified material in her first go-round in this matter. If she continues down that path, denying prosecutors the opportunity to avail themselves of the protections CIPA provides, they will appeal her to the 11th Circuit. If her CIPA rulings are as lackadaisical as the orders that caused the 11th Circuit to reverse her in the search warrant matter, that won’t go well. If she continues to put her thumbs on the scales of justice for the former president, she could easily find herself not just reversed, but subject to an order by the circuit court that, on remand, the chief judge in her district reassign the case to another judge. Because the government will have to appeal any egregious mistakes the judge makes in really on CIPA matters, this is a prime opportunity to request reassignment of the case without injecting any additional delay into the case.'

'Word is, Judge Cannon has declined to recuse from the case on her own. It’s unlikely she’ll have the final say on that matter.' (Joyce Vance)

Expand full comment