33 Comments

In honor of Kansas, how about Dorothy for your chicken? Or Aunt Em?

Expand full comment

Thank you for seeing Idaho. I thank DOJ, too. As a blue girl in this red state, frustrating doesn't begin to describe what it's like to live here. May EMTALA prevail in this case and may it build to more autonomy over our bodies.

Chick names: BG (Brittany Griner), Spud, Tater(for success in Idaho), Bennie , Liz, Zoe (Jan 6 committee)

Expand full comment
founding

How about no names that are side dishes for chicken fingers, nuggets, etc. Those types of names would be a constant reminder of where they'll end up eventually.

I sympathize with your frustration. We no longer visit Idaho, nor parts of the east side of Washington State. The survivalist types (it's the nicest word to describe them), that roam the woods don't like visitors. They told us to leave, so we did. Plus, it's Covid country.

Expand full comment

I am glad I subscribed. Enjoy your writing. Appreciate your knowledge and opinions.

Expand full comment
founding

Joyce! BRILLIANT!

Expand full comment

Joyce, thank you. This sentence really strikes me: "...too many legislatures have substituted their judgments for those doctors and patients should be making." Representation matters. And who represents me matters. Oh my, yes.

Expand full comment
founding

Thanks for all this information and insight.

Expand full comment

Chick name: How about Cassidy? One of the heroes of the summer!

Expand full comment

"In Idaho, doctors will who perform medically necessary abortions, including ones following an incomplete miscarriage or severe preeclampsia to prevent the patient from becoming dangerously ill and possibly dying, can be arrested, and charged, even though the medical procedure was necessary. Doctors can become defendants in criminal cases if they treat a patient whose pregnancy complications could lead to septic infection or hemorrhage. They face 2 to 5 years, while nurses and staff who support procedures risk losing their licenses."

How is this not a complete reversal of the Hippocratic Oath medical graduates take?

"I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God."

So, who has more power...an oath taken or forced-birth legislators?

Expand full comment

Has there been a test case about state laws that would seem to prevent medical professionals from acting in accordance with their the Hippocratic Oath?

Expand full comment

Sonia, Ketanji, Elena, maybe John

Expand full comment

Thank you, Joyce, for your column.

I am glad you are happy with your baby chicks! Two should be named after you! One = "Joyce". The second = "Alene".

Goodnight!

Expand full comment

Thank you for your insight and focus. It helps clarify some of the massive information out there. Now, for the chicks: Hope, Justice, Purl and Libby (for Liberty). ❤️

Expand full comment

Chick names:

Chicken Little

Pullet Point

Admiral Mick Craven

Speaker of the Hen House

Biddy Body

Run a Fowl

Expand full comment

Thank you for adding clarity to the hope.

Expand full comment

Good morning. Does EMTALA protection that DOJ seeks to affirm mean that the actual care of the patient must take place in an emergency department? What if the patient has been admitted to the OB unit and becomes emergently ill requiring intervention? Many thanks.

Expand full comment
Aug 5, 2022·edited Aug 5, 2022

Question. Is this contingent on the Hyde amendment? I know the military said they would follow existing federal law.

If so doesn’t congress have to approve that every so often? I remember that being a big issue. No federal funds for abortions. But I recently learned that the Hyde amendment does allow abortions in cases of rape and incest as well as when the life of the mother is threatened.

I’m trying to understand. The supremacy clause allows the federal government to enforce existing laws which give them the power to trump state law. That’s where in my thinking the Hyde amendment comes in.

Can republicans allow the Hyde Amendment to expire is what I’m getting at. Or can it be codified in some way? I don’t believe it would get 60 votes.

Expand full comment