Fulton County Update
Judge J.P. Boulee, the federal judge in the Northern District of Georgia who is hearing the Fulton County voting records case, issued an order this morning. It reads: “The Court understands that mediation has been unsuccessful. Consequently, the Court is now taking the Motion to Vacate Hearing and to Quash Subpoena under advisement.”
After the Justice Department executed a search warrant and seized ballots and other records from Fulton County, the County filed a motion under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure seeking the return of their records. That motion triggers a process where the court holds a hearing and takes evidence so it has a basis for deciding the motion. That process isn’t optional; it’s required under a case called Franks v. Delaware, where the Supreme Court held, “The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion.”
The government responded by filing a motion to prevent the hearing from taking place, and especially, to quash the subpoena that requires the FBI Agent, whose under oath affidavit provided the rationale for the search warrant, to testify at the hearing. We discussed the warrant and its contents in detail here. You may recall that there was a lot of surprise when the warrant passed muster with the magistrate judge who signed off on it, because the affidavit provided more speculation than it did probable cause. That could make for some interesting testimony and offer a solid reason why the government might want to keep the agent off the stand.
Judge Boulee has asked for supplemental briefs from the parties this week. He wants them to focus on the standard courts use to determine whether the government is unreasonably attempting to shield one of its employees from testifying, which involves assessing whether the government's action was “arbitrary and capricious.” The mediation failure means that the government is declining to return Fulton County’s records, even though it would be permitted to retain a copy if ordered to return the originals.
The Judge will hold the hearing on this matter on Friday, March 27, 2026, at 9:00 AM, proving that courts can move quickly when they choose to do so.
Lauren Groh-Wargo, the CEO of Fair Fight Action in Georgia, told me that “It’s not surprising mediation failed when the government’s rationale is a compendium of false claims written by conspiracy theorists. The judge is clearly concerned about this illegal seizure and is proceeding with short timelines – indicating he knows voters deserve clarity and a quick resolution.”
The outcome of the matter in Fulton County could have strong repercussions across the country, as Trump continues to try to relitigate the 2020 election in states where he lost. Although the government is almost certain to appeal if it loses before Judge Boulee, this is the same Eleventh Circuit that was hostile to Northern District of Florida Judge Aileen Cannon’s one-sided actions, and it may not be an overly friendly forum for the government, depending on the panel of judges it draws and how strong the perception that it’s behaving in an unduly heavy-handed manner is.
Rumors of the demise of the rule of law seem to be overblown.
If you’ve been following this case with me, you know the backstory—and tonight’s outcome shows why the details matter. Paid subscribers get the full context, the key filings, and the analysis that makes sense of what happens next. Join us and stay ahead of the story.
If you’ve been following this case with me, you know the backstory—and today’s update shows why those details matter. Paid subscribers make it possible for me to provide the full context, key filings, and analysis that helps us make sense of what has happened and what is going to happen next. Subscribe to Civil Discourse and stay on top of the story.
We’re in this together,
Joyce



Still waiting for Trump’s “conclusive evidence” that the 2020 election was indeed rigged. And while we’re at it, why doesn’t he, the “aggrieved party” bring suit in his own name? Something about “under penalty of perjury”?
Why isn’t the magistrate judge who signed off on the original warrant not being confronted?