7 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

In my opinion: This was a setup. There was no evidence beyond the allegation. There was no consideration of case law. There was no injury. There was no standing. The six people who signed the decision in favor are imposters just like Trump. They had a price and someone met it. Conservative is redefined as I can own you without penalty. The for sale lineup will continue to grow. I am so fucking sad.

Expand full comment

I hate to say it, but I agree. The fact that this was a made-up case is sad & pathetic. Justice Robert's shouldn't have allowed it to make it to the Supreme Court.

Expand full comment

Justice Roberts is one of them...maybe worse. He’s upset now because people are beginning to see through his veneer. A wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Expand full comment

Agreed, and what appalls me the most is there's no recourse for us. I hate the Court almost as much as I hate trump, because their power is totally unchecked.

I still want to see somebody say, "I'm ignoring your fascist ruling."

Expand full comment

The recourse begins on November 5, 2024. Eject the fascists who gave us this court from Opus Dei.

Expand full comment

Apparently there is recourse in the particular case of the website designer. My understanding is that the claim of inaccuracy/fraud can be brought by the state of Colorado. When new information surfaces (there was no gay man who asked for a wedding website). But will that happen?

Expand full comment

Let your sorrow guide you back to Joyce Vance and all who serve in trust of our country’s ideals. It is here that possibilities abound and it links us in that direction.

Expand full comment