Discussion about this post

User's avatar
D . O. Olson's avatar

Have you read Jamie Raskins letter to trump outlining how anyone violating court order to restore any illegal dismantling can be held in contempt and face jail time without pardon by the executive? Also mentions that if the DOJ refuses to bring charges, the judge can appoint an independent prosecutor.. this is supposedly all codified..they can start with musk and move on to linda if they illegally dismantle and ignore courts stay and order to reinstate.. i dont think Raskin is talking thru his ass here.

Jack Jordan's avatar

Trump usurping the power to eliminate something that Congress created by law is “the very definition of tyranny.” Moreover, it was exactly the kind of usurpation of power that the Framers designed our Constitution to preclude. As James Madison (echoing Montesquieu), fairly famously highlighted in The Federalist No. 47, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many” is “the very definition of tyranny.”

The Framers of our Constitution devoted considerable effort to limiting and separating powers. That is exactly why every state and federal Constitution separates powers among three distinct co-equal branches. Again and again in the past two months, Trump has usurped the powers of legislators, judges, juries and even the sovereign people, themselves (in the First Amendment).

Trump attacking people for exercising their freedom of expression and freedom of association (federal government employees, a university, students, lawyers, law firms, judges and journalists and publishers)) is the very definition of tyranny. Trump shipping people to a prison in El Salvador before any judge or jury has reviewed the material facts (and proof of facts that Congress established were material in federal law) is the very definition of tyranny.

285 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?