Trump assumes dominance- He recovers from attempts to take him down with the truth in the face of his bald-faced lying. He could not take one more minute of the interview.
I read that line and immediately had your reaction. Thanks for highlighting it, I guess. I shake my head and wonder if there is a bottom. None that I can see.
I learned a long time ago there is NO bottom with the orange menace. Previously, whenever DJT committed some illegal act, uttered one of his outrageous lies, engaged in vicious, sexist name calling, or came up with a new grifting scheme, I would say to myself, "This is it. This will do him in." I NEVER ever think that way anymore. I think that some members of the press actually like having him in the public eye as it makes their reporting more exciting and/or, in some cases, titillating.
I would love to sue Trump, for ten years of unbelievable stress, sadness, shock, fury, embarrassment, anxiety, humiliation on the world stage, and request actual damages for the last year and a half as I am positive I’ve aged twice that amount with his constant corruption, lawlessness, terrorism and his endless menacing obsession on my home state of California and my home city, Los Angeles. A year ago today, the Dictator let loose ICE goons, took over our National Guard and eventually brought in 900 Marines for the first of his “Let’s Terrorize, Beat and M**der Innocent Americans Tour.” And yes, we are *all* Americans; growing up as a native Angeleno, the greatest gift I learned growing up here in this beautifully diverse city, is to see people as human beings, not as green cards, or visas, or as legal or illegal. I cannot fathom seeing my fellow Americans any other way.
I, like you, am a born and raised Californian (SF Bay Area). We relocated to Idaho to be near our kids and their families. Most people here hate Californians and blame us for all the bad stuff that happens here. It's disgusting. I now have a full wardrobe of California hats, shirts, you name it, and I wear them proudly. I'm 80 now, and can't run anymore but I dare anyone to trash my real "home" with insults and accusations. There is so much wrong here, there's plenty of fodder for smart comebacks. You continue holding your head high and be proud of who and where you are. I would give anything to go back to Cali and live in peace. Or if not in peace, then, defiantly protesting against anyone who tries to destroy our / your way of life. You go, Girl! ❣️
Awww thanks. 😂 You rock those shirts and hats! I’m 59 and I 100% hear you on having to experience every insult in the world re: L.A. and CA. Are these places perfect? Hell no! Not even close. I have ISSUES with the city and state but the insane hatred is odd. My cousins left Orange County for Idaho. They are full MAGA and admittedly, real estate is even more obscenely expensive here, as you know, so they left for two reasons. One was to buy a bigger house. I will let you guess the other reason. 🙄
Oh, that's an easy guess. I'm sorry. I have MAGA family in California, too. It's not fun to try and navigate that. And guess what, the housing here has also gone sky high (for which we're blamed, also). My answer to that is, "We paid what you demanded as a price." And, the house was hideously over priced and had to be gutted inside and out. Just hang in and keep on pushing forward. I know it's hard, especially now, given all the ugly crap and whining about the Cali primary. I'm outraged over all the ignorant mouthpieces, like Meghan Kelly, saying that the voting protocol that allows vote count to take that long should be terminated. She has bought into the "get rid of mail-in voting" chant sung by the ugly orange turd and his turdettes. NO WAY! Each state has the constitutional right to determine its own voting process. Link arms and stand strong. 💯
Taxpayers have had their taxes diverted from programs to aid the taxpayers in order to pay for vanity projects, grifting schemes, and wars. As for DJT's claim that retirement funds have grown: in December of 2024, my fund showed a good gain; at the end of 2025, it had not gained a single penny.
Not "half",,,,, merely 22% of the population voted for the Orange Turd pedophile rapist felon. Also, 22% voted for Vice President Kamala Harris. That leaves 66% of the population --- a good number are under the age for voting,,, but, the rest? Stayed home? Couldn't bring their misogynistic selves to vote for an extremely qualified woman over a pedophile-rapist-criminal-and-more white boy? The answer to both questions is a resounding "Yes". However - a big percentage of those 66% have been shaken out of their apathy and are reacting to and protesting the Turd. This means we have a vast majority of newly moved people who are protesting, either loudly or quietly. We can hope.
Not sure there's a class that would have standing? In any event, the only class action that will matter is in November, and I think we can't count on anything if the Trump oligarch-tech bros have rigged the election software in ways that can't be detected ahead of time, and/or if Nazis Miller, Vought and Hegseth decide they need to quell volting with their brownshirts. The hard-core White Supremacist, AR-15 MAGA base might be only 20% of the voting population, but they are dangerous, nor should we assume the "don't bother me with politics" crowd--the ones that didn't vote last election--are going to have had a come-to-Jesus moment in which they realize the world is bigger than themselves, their family, friends, and stuff. So, the total number of Americans who don't qualify as concerned citizens is pretty damn big.
Next Sunday I am going to a museum which celebrates Black artists, their work, and their importance. I may have dinner with friends to celebrate the rich cultural opportunities we must support and protect. I'll give no support for CBS/Paramount and the fiasco in DC.
Joyce, fine article, but please improve journalism by example: Don't write that the SENATE was... Instead, the REPUBLICAN SENATORS were ... cowed, co-complicit. or whatever. Don't blame an institution or entity; blame the ACTUAL ACTORS who are at fault! Thanks for your good work.
UFC fighting is just another degradation of everything the White House, the People's House, stands for, at least for most Americans, especially those who have lost love ones defending what this country represents and holds dear.
From the time I was a kid in the 60s, I used to enjoy professional wrestling, and when I got older, extended that to both American and Japanese versions, both male and female contestants, and from the time I was a little kid, always knowing it was a "work" and not a real athletic event.
Not to *ever* suggest that the wrestlers themselves aren't actually skilled athletes, whose #1 Rule is "Protect your opponent".
But it is not, and has never been, an actual "sport".
Regardless of your opinion on fighting events, the idea that this shit belongs on the grounds of the Peoples' House is beyond the pale.
Staging a professional fight - even between actual stars like Muhammad Ali and anyone else - on the grounds of the White House would *still* be an indefensible abomination.
As a dear departed friend and fellow pro-wrestling enthusiast put it ~4 decades ago when dealing with people who said "Pro wresting is fake!" replied, "Of *course* we know it's fake. We wouldn't watch it if we thought it was real."
Not sure it changes your point, but UFC is not professional wrestling. UFC is a mixed martial arts competition. The fights are not pre-determined.
Never really understood the whole 'wrestling is fake' thing. It's an entertainment program/event; one where the performers are expected to wrestle multiple times per week and sometimes per day. It wouldn't be possible to present that much content if the wrestlers didn't take care not to hurt each other.
Appreciate your reply, and take your point re: UFC, but no, it really doesn't change my point, which is that none of this belongs on the premises of The People's House.
I will add that Trmup neither understands nor cares about the difference between the UFC and the WWE or he wouldn't have appointed Vince McMahon's creepy wife to be in charge of public education.
The man is, as he was perfectly described decades ago, "A short-fingered vulgarian".
EDIT: On further thought, before I go to sleep, a UFC bout on the grounds of the White House is *much* worse than a pro-wrestling match *because* it is not
merely entertainment, but an actual *blood sport*, the only difference between which and a gladiator match being that the loser is not expected to die.
And it is even more a profanity of everything the White House is supposed to represent.
Maybe a drive in movie theater? People could pay to park on the White House lawn and watch the Melania movie playing 24/7. There could be a refreshment kiosk offering tRump wine, popcorn, candy, pizza with DJT's face on it, etc..
Is there a way for individuals to join the suit against the UFC "spectacle.?"
As an American, and as an artist, I am aggrieved by this offensive display. I am nauseated, and full of anxiety, over the condition of the White House, a symbol which I once regarded with pride.
I also suffer physical and aesthetic harm over the use of the Lincoln memorial for this debased use.
Is there anywhere a petition that can be signed - by what I can only assume to be many millions of people suffering the same abuse - so that we may be considered as "having standing?"
Get your popcorn ready; could be an entertaining Friday (12) as two courts are expected to resume their proceedings related to the "settled" Trump-IRS "case." The fact that the former DOJ has now formally (in writing) advised the court in the EDVA, which issued a temporary restraining order on establishing or funding the $1.8B slush fund, that it is dead, does not moot the case. Courts tend to treat “voluntary cessation” with suspicion. A defendant cannot escape judicial review simply by saying: “We promise we won’t do it again.” Judge Brinkema can still: hold the June 12th hearing, demand sworn declarations and require proof the fund cannot be revived, or even issue a ruling on the legality of the underlying settlement. On the other hand, the former DOJ filing with Judge Brinkema's court will have little to no effect on Judge Williams's SDFL effort to determine whether to reopen the entire Trump-IRS "case." She is expecting Trump’s lawyers (and the former DOJ) to file their written response by June 12 to the motion filed by 35 retired federal judges alleging that the Trump–IRS suit "settlement" was collusive, fraudulent, and deceptive and moreover, why the case should not be reopened. Judge Williams is focused on: whether there was ever a real “case or controversy” (as required under Art. III of the Constitution), whether the settlement was engineered to benefit Trump personally, and whether the remaining audit‑immunity clause or addendum to the settlement is lawful. The former DOJ’s statement that the fund is dead does not address: the audit‑immunity addendum (which the former DOJ is still honoring), the legitimacy of the settlement, or the possibility of collusion. So, the bottom line is: the Florida case remains fully active, and the former DOJ’s filing in Virginia does not change its trajectory. In short, the former DOJ filing does not accomplish: ending the Virginia case; ending the Florida case; eliminating judicial scrutiny of the settlement; removing the audit‑immunity addendum or preventing the court(s) from ruling the entire settlement void.
The Trump corruption is over the top, and the Republicans who could not bring themselves to vote against the fund and the favored IRS audit terms for the Trump crime syndicate should be ashamed of themselves. Trump thinks nothing of Americans' financial struggles as a result of his illegal war.
We voters must put an end to the corruption, since the current Congressional majority has willingly emasculated themselves.
The only 'crypto' I will ever endorse is the one that will be built to enclose the ashes of all members of this maladminstration once they meet their (non-violent) appointed day with their maker.
As of march 2025, over 79 million people had paramount plus subscriptions. I kind of doubt they are all republicans. I am out of patience for people who bitch about this admin but continue to pay it.
He, Trump, upon loosing his shit, called NBC, Meet the Press and Welker crooked and she stupid. Welker keeps insisting there is no evidence to support his bullshit remarks. Until a reporter stands up to him to say, WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE THAT YOU CAN SPEAK TO ME LIKE THAT. YOUR JOB TITLE DOES NOT GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO SPEAK TO ME IN THAT DEGRADING FASHON! YOU DON’T SEE ME CALLING YOU A LYING REPUGNANT GRIFTER, REGARDLESS OF IT’S ACCURACY. Then it should be the reporter that ends the interview, gaggle or whatever press avail form it was taking. He keeps doing it because they keep taking it. Her pushing back as she did is the job, she doesn’t get a “way to go” for finally doing her job.
What's that expression about karma? The conservative legal movement spent 40 years trying to weaken the administrative state. They succeeded. But the doctrinal tools they created — especially "Loper Bright" and "Corner Post" — now empower challengers to attack Trump’s own agencies’ actions, not just Biden’s. It’s the administrative‑law version of “the call is coming from inside the house.” Before "Chevron," if a statute was ambiguous, courts deferred to the agency’s interpretation as long as it was “reasonable.” After "Loper Bright" courts interpret statutes "de novo" — from scratch — with zero deference to the agency, with the practical effect that, any Trump‑era rule that relied on: aggressive statutory interpretation, ambiguous text, or a “reasonable” reading that wasn’t the "best" reading…is now much easier to strike down. Pre–"Corner Post": Administrative Procedural Act challenges had to be filed within 6 years of the rule’s issuance. Trump‑era rules from 2017–2020 were aging out. After "Corner Post," the 6‑year clock does not start when the rule is issued. It starts when a plaintiff is first injured. Meaning: a business created in 2025 can sue over a 2018 rule, a state newly affected by a policy can sue in 2026, a group that didn’t exist during the Trump years can sue now. This has the practical effect of making Trump‑era rules that were previously “safe” because the deadline passed now fully open to new litigation. In essence, the statute‑of‑limitations wall is gone. In a (large) nutshell, this all means that Trump-era rules are uniquely exposed because they can be litigated again and are now much harder to defend.
Its so sad that so many are just gone.. reality drained from their lives, adopting all his hate for themselves, maybe in some cases even validating who they have always been
"Darling". The misogynistic thin-skinned orange prick.
And then he patted her condescendingly on the shoulder. I wish she had said, "Don't touch me!"
I yelled "don't touch her" at the broadcast on TV. It pissed me off.
He did? F that
Some described it as "he almost fell and grabbed her to prevent that".
Trump assumes dominance- He recovers from attempts to take him down with the truth in the face of his bald-faced lying. He could not take one more minute of the interview.
Actually I think he grabbed her shoulder for balance. He looked like he was about to fall from stepping on the mic.
I read that line and immediately had your reaction. Thanks for highlighting it, I guess. I shake my head and wonder if there is a bottom. None that I can see.
I learned a long time ago there is NO bottom with the orange menace. Previously, whenever DJT committed some illegal act, uttered one of his outrageous lies, engaged in vicious, sexist name calling, or came up with a new grifting scheme, I would say to myself, "This is it. This will do him in." I NEVER ever think that way anymore. I think that some members of the press actually like having him in the public eye as it makes their reporting more exciting and/or, in some cases, titillating.
So here's the campaign ad for this fall: juxtapose the " no evidence" interview with video from January 6, and play the sound for both.
Has he ever treated a white man this way? The answer is obvious!
Hubby, Jim speaking — OH, HELL YEAH!!! HOWEVER YOU'RE BEING FAR TOO GENEROUSLY POLITE.
Oh believe me… I know way too many adjectives. We all do!
Jim, again: Oh, Hell yeah!!!
I would love to sue Trump, for ten years of unbelievable stress, sadness, shock, fury, embarrassment, anxiety, humiliation on the world stage, and request actual damages for the last year and a half as I am positive I’ve aged twice that amount with his constant corruption, lawlessness, terrorism and his endless menacing obsession on my home state of California and my home city, Los Angeles. A year ago today, the Dictator let loose ICE goons, took over our National Guard and eventually brought in 900 Marines for the first of his “Let’s Terrorize, Beat and M**der Innocent Americans Tour.” And yes, we are *all* Americans; growing up as a native Angeleno, the greatest gift I learned growing up here in this beautifully diverse city, is to see people as human beings, not as green cards, or visas, or as legal or illegal. I cannot fathom seeing my fellow Americans any other way.
I, like you, am a born and raised Californian (SF Bay Area). We relocated to Idaho to be near our kids and their families. Most people here hate Californians and blame us for all the bad stuff that happens here. It's disgusting. I now have a full wardrobe of California hats, shirts, you name it, and I wear them proudly. I'm 80 now, and can't run anymore but I dare anyone to trash my real "home" with insults and accusations. There is so much wrong here, there's plenty of fodder for smart comebacks. You continue holding your head high and be proud of who and where you are. I would give anything to go back to Cali and live in peace. Or if not in peace, then, defiantly protesting against anyone who tries to destroy our / your way of life. You go, Girl! ❣️
Awww thanks. 😂 You rock those shirts and hats! I’m 59 and I 100% hear you on having to experience every insult in the world re: L.A. and CA. Are these places perfect? Hell no! Not even close. I have ISSUES with the city and state but the insane hatred is odd. My cousins left Orange County for Idaho. They are full MAGA and admittedly, real estate is even more obscenely expensive here, as you know, so they left for two reasons. One was to buy a bigger house. I will let you guess the other reason. 🙄
Oh, that's an easy guess. I'm sorry. I have MAGA family in California, too. It's not fun to try and navigate that. And guess what, the housing here has also gone sky high (for which we're blamed, also). My answer to that is, "We paid what you demanded as a price." And, the house was hideously over priced and had to be gutted inside and out. Just hang in and keep on pushing forward. I know it's hard, especially now, given all the ugly crap and whining about the Cali primary. I'm outraged over all the ignorant mouthpieces, like Meghan Kelly, saying that the voting protocol that allows vote count to take that long should be terminated. She has bought into the "get rid of mail-in voting" chant sung by the ugly orange turd and his turdettes. NO WAY! Each state has the constitutional right to determine its own voting process. Link arms and stand strong. 💯
Class action suit.lets do it
Yes, please.
Taxpayers have had their taxes diverted from programs to aid the taxpayers in order to pay for vanity projects, grifting schemes, and wars. As for DJT's claim that retirement funds have grown: in December of 2024, my fund showed a good gain; at the end of 2025, it had not gained a single penny.
Its not just one man. Half the country supports him. And they control congress and the court. Pure fascism and fascists in control.
Not half.
And not forever, either.
The resistance is building.
💪
About 30% who will never quit him. And who wonder where the sun goes at night.
Jen, I know...how does that even work with a flat earth?
works fine with a flat head...
Not "half",,,,, merely 22% of the population voted for the Orange Turd pedophile rapist felon. Also, 22% voted for Vice President Kamala Harris. That leaves 66% of the population --- a good number are under the age for voting,,, but, the rest? Stayed home? Couldn't bring their misogynistic selves to vote for an extremely qualified woman over a pedophile-rapist-criminal-and-more white boy? The answer to both questions is a resounding "Yes". However - a big percentage of those 66% have been shaken out of their apathy and are reacting to and protesting the Turd. This means we have a vast majority of newly moved people who are protesting, either loudly or quietly. We can hope.
I truly hope you are right!!
I feel like this too, I was wondering if a class action suit would be appropriate!!
Not sure there's a class that would have standing? In any event, the only class action that will matter is in November, and I think we can't count on anything if the Trump oligarch-tech bros have rigged the election software in ways that can't be detected ahead of time, and/or if Nazis Miller, Vought and Hegseth decide they need to quell volting with their brownshirts. The hard-core White Supremacist, AR-15 MAGA base might be only 20% of the voting population, but they are dangerous, nor should we assume the "don't bother me with politics" crowd--the ones that didn't vote last election--are going to have had a come-to-Jesus moment in which they realize the world is bigger than themselves, their family, friends, and stuff. So, the total number of Americans who don't qualify as concerned citizens is pretty damn big.
Next Sunday I am going to a museum which celebrates Black artists, their work, and their importance. I may have dinner with friends to celebrate the rich cultural opportunities we must support and protect. I'll give no support for CBS/Paramount and the fiasco in DC.
Joyce, fine article, but please improve journalism by example: Don't write that the SENATE was... Instead, the REPUBLICAN SENATORS were ... cowed, co-complicit. or whatever. Don't blame an institution or entity; blame the ACTUAL ACTORS who are at fault! Thanks for your good work.
UFC fighting is just another degradation of everything the White House, the People's House, stands for, at least for most Americans, especially those who have lost love ones defending what this country represents and holds dear.
From the time I was a kid in the 60s, I used to enjoy professional wrestling, and when I got older, extended that to both American and Japanese versions, both male and female contestants, and from the time I was a little kid, always knowing it was a "work" and not a real athletic event.
Not to *ever* suggest that the wrestlers themselves aren't actually skilled athletes, whose #1 Rule is "Protect your opponent".
But it is not, and has never been, an actual "sport".
Regardless of your opinion on fighting events, the idea that this shit belongs on the grounds of the Peoples' House is beyond the pale.
Staging a professional fight - even between actual stars like Muhammad Ali and anyone else - on the grounds of the White House would *still* be an indefensible abomination.
As a dear departed friend and fellow pro-wrestling enthusiast put it ~4 decades ago when dealing with people who said "Pro wresting is fake!" replied, "Of *course* we know it's fake. We wouldn't watch it if we thought it was real."
Not sure it changes your point, but UFC is not professional wrestling. UFC is a mixed martial arts competition. The fights are not pre-determined.
Never really understood the whole 'wrestling is fake' thing. It's an entertainment program/event; one where the performers are expected to wrestle multiple times per week and sometimes per day. It wouldn't be possible to present that much content if the wrestlers didn't take care not to hurt each other.
Appreciate your reply, and take your point re: UFC, but no, it really doesn't change my point, which is that none of this belongs on the premises of The People's House.
I will add that Trmup neither understands nor cares about the difference between the UFC and the WWE or he wouldn't have appointed Vince McMahon's creepy wife to be in charge of public education.
The man is, as he was perfectly described decades ago, "A short-fingered vulgarian".
EDIT: On further thought, before I go to sleep, a UFC bout on the grounds of the White House is *much* worse than a pro-wrestling match *because* it is not
merely entertainment, but an actual *blood sport*, the only difference between which and a gladiator match being that the loser is not expected to die.
And it is even more a profanity of everything the White House is supposed to represent.
What's next cock fights--sanctioned by the guys with small ones?
Maybe a drive in movie theater? People could pay to park on the White House lawn and watch the Melania movie playing 24/7. There could be a refreshment kiosk offering tRump wine, popcorn, candy, pizza with DJT's face on it, etc..
I won't be paying $8.99 plus tax to watch this. And I'm glad someone is suing to try to stop it.
I wouldn't watch it if it was free. I'd rather watch ads.
Well, I might draw the line at the Liberty Mutual ads...
🤣🤣🤣
Ludicrously blatant corruption that defiles the spirit of Lee’s June 7th, 1776 resolution. Thank you for reminding us of our history, Joyce.
Is there a way for individuals to join the suit against the UFC "spectacle.?"
As an American, and as an artist, I am aggrieved by this offensive display. I am nauseated, and full of anxiety, over the condition of the White House, a symbol which I once regarded with pride.
I also suffer physical and aesthetic harm over the use of the Lincoln memorial for this debased use.
Is there anywhere a petition that can be signed - by what I can only assume to be many millions of people suffering the same abuse - so that we may be considered as "having standing?"
Get your popcorn ready; could be an entertaining Friday (12) as two courts are expected to resume their proceedings related to the "settled" Trump-IRS "case." The fact that the former DOJ has now formally (in writing) advised the court in the EDVA, which issued a temporary restraining order on establishing or funding the $1.8B slush fund, that it is dead, does not moot the case. Courts tend to treat “voluntary cessation” with suspicion. A defendant cannot escape judicial review simply by saying: “We promise we won’t do it again.” Judge Brinkema can still: hold the June 12th hearing, demand sworn declarations and require proof the fund cannot be revived, or even issue a ruling on the legality of the underlying settlement. On the other hand, the former DOJ filing with Judge Brinkema's court will have little to no effect on Judge Williams's SDFL effort to determine whether to reopen the entire Trump-IRS "case." She is expecting Trump’s lawyers (and the former DOJ) to file their written response by June 12 to the motion filed by 35 retired federal judges alleging that the Trump–IRS suit "settlement" was collusive, fraudulent, and deceptive and moreover, why the case should not be reopened. Judge Williams is focused on: whether there was ever a real “case or controversy” (as required under Art. III of the Constitution), whether the settlement was engineered to benefit Trump personally, and whether the remaining audit‑immunity clause or addendum to the settlement is lawful. The former DOJ’s statement that the fund is dead does not address: the audit‑immunity addendum (which the former DOJ is still honoring), the legitimacy of the settlement, or the possibility of collusion. So, the bottom line is: the Florida case remains fully active, and the former DOJ’s filing in Virginia does not change its trajectory. In short, the former DOJ filing does not accomplish: ending the Virginia case; ending the Florida case; eliminating judicial scrutiny of the settlement; removing the audit‑immunity addendum or preventing the court(s) from ruling the entire settlement void.
The Trump corruption is over the top, and the Republicans who could not bring themselves to vote against the fund and the favored IRS audit terms for the Trump crime syndicate should be ashamed of themselves. Trump thinks nothing of Americans' financial struggles as a result of his illegal war.
We voters must put an end to the corruption, since the current Congressional majority has willingly emasculated themselves.
The only 'crypto' I will ever endorse is the one that will be built to enclose the ashes of all members of this maladminstration once they meet their (non-violent) appointed day with their maker.
they will need to be covered with huge rocks to keep them in
As of march 2025, over 79 million people had paramount plus subscriptions. I kind of doubt they are all republicans. I am out of patience for people who bitch about this admin but continue to pay it.
Agree, and same with Amazon. Americans are too lazy to give up convenience and so we’re going to get the government they want, I guess.
Yes amazon too. This country almost deserves the gov't we have, unfortunately our intentional stupidity impacts the rest of the world.
no Emma, it's real stupidity
He, Trump, upon loosing his shit, called NBC, Meet the Press and Welker crooked and she stupid. Welker keeps insisting there is no evidence to support his bullshit remarks. Until a reporter stands up to him to say, WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE THAT YOU CAN SPEAK TO ME LIKE THAT. YOUR JOB TITLE DOES NOT GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO SPEAK TO ME IN THAT DEGRADING FASHON! YOU DON’T SEE ME CALLING YOU A LYING REPUGNANT GRIFTER, REGARDLESS OF IT’S ACCURACY. Then it should be the reporter that ends the interview, gaggle or whatever press avail form it was taking. He keeps doing it because they keep taking it. Her pushing back as she did is the job, she doesn’t get a “way to go” for finally doing her job.
What's that expression about karma? The conservative legal movement spent 40 years trying to weaken the administrative state. They succeeded. But the doctrinal tools they created — especially "Loper Bright" and "Corner Post" — now empower challengers to attack Trump’s own agencies’ actions, not just Biden’s. It’s the administrative‑law version of “the call is coming from inside the house.” Before "Chevron," if a statute was ambiguous, courts deferred to the agency’s interpretation as long as it was “reasonable.” After "Loper Bright" courts interpret statutes "de novo" — from scratch — with zero deference to the agency, with the practical effect that, any Trump‑era rule that relied on: aggressive statutory interpretation, ambiguous text, or a “reasonable” reading that wasn’t the "best" reading…is now much easier to strike down. Pre–"Corner Post": Administrative Procedural Act challenges had to be filed within 6 years of the rule’s issuance. Trump‑era rules from 2017–2020 were aging out. After "Corner Post," the 6‑year clock does not start when the rule is issued. It starts when a plaintiff is first injured. Meaning: a business created in 2025 can sue over a 2018 rule, a state newly affected by a policy can sue in 2026, a group that didn’t exist during the Trump years can sue now. This has the practical effect of making Trump‑era rules that were previously “safe” because the deadline passed now fully open to new litigation. In essence, the statute‑of‑limitations wall is gone. In a (large) nutshell, this all means that Trump-era rules are uniquely exposed because they can be litigated again and are now much harder to defend.
And all those who love the guy unfortunately don’t access any of this.. they live on their own planet with its own news service.
I hesitate to "like" your comment but you are, sadly, absolutely correct.
Its so sad that so many are just gone.. reality drained from their lives, adopting all his hate for themselves, maybe in some cases even validating who they have always been
Congratulations on four years of amazing patriotic legal and political journalism! We are in this together. ✊🏼🥰🍷